0
A vector can be resolved into infinitely many sets of components in both 2D and 3D space.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A vector may be resolved into only two components?
No, a vector in 3-d space would normally be resolved into 3 components. It all depends on the dimensionality of the space that you are working within.
What is the purpose of vector resolution in adding vectors?
Vector addition does not follow the familiar rules of addition as applied to addition of numbers. However, if vectors are resolved into their components, the rules of addition do apply for these components. There is a further advantage when vectors are resolved along orthogonal (mutually perpendicular) directions. A vector has no effect in a direction perpendicular to its own direction.
How resolution of vector is used in applying the component methods in adding vectors?
The related question has a nice detail of this. Each vector is resolved into component vectors. For 2-dimensions, it is an x-component and a y-component. Then the respective components are added. These added components make up the resultant vector.
What is the sum of two or more vectors added together called?
The sum of any number of vectors is itself a vector, just as the sum of any number of scalars (normal numbers) is a normal number.If a vector is resolved into 2 components, x and y, in the form [x,y], then it can be added to any other vector resolved into 2 components [z,a].[x,y]+[z,a]=[x+z,y+a]
What is difference in resultant vector and vector resolution?
the difference between resultant vector and resolution of vector is that the addition of two or more vectors can be represented by a single vector which is termed as a resultant vector. And the decomposition of a vector into its components is called resolution of vectors.
Can stress be resolved into horizontal and vertical components?
Force can be resolved into horizontal and vertical components using vector analysis. However stress cannot be resolved into horizontal and vertical components using vector analysis since it is not a vector but a tensor of second order.
A vector may be resolved into only two components?
No, a vector in 3-d space would normally be resolved into 3 components. It all depends on the dimensionality of the space that you are working within.
Is it possible for a vector to be zero if its one of the components is zero?
NO, a vector will not be zero if one of its components will be zero.
What is the purpose of vector resolution in adding vectors?
Vector addition does not follow the familiar rules of addition as applied to addition of numbers. However, if vectors are resolved into their components, the rules of addition do apply for these components. There is a further advantage when vectors are resolved along orthogonal (mutually perpendicular) directions. A vector has no effect in a direction perpendicular to its own direction.
How many components have a vector?
It is the other way round - it's the vector that has components.In general, a vector can have one or more components - though a vector with a single component is often called a "scalar" instead - but technically, a scalar is a special case of a vector.
Vector may be resolved into only two components?
A vector may be represented as a combination of as many components as you feel would satisfy you, without limit. Whatever ludicrous quantity you choose, for whatever private reason, a group of that many vectorlets can always be defined that combine to have precisely the magnitude and direction of the original single vector. Even though this fact is worth contemplating for a second or two, it's generally ignored, mainly because it is so useless in the practical sense ... it doesn't make a vector any easier to work with when it is replaced by 347 components, for example. The most useful number of components is: one for each dimension of the space in which the original vector lives. Two components to represent a vector on a flat graph, and three components to represent a vector in our world.
Vector may be resolved into only three components?
A vector may be represented as a combination of as many components as you feel would satisfy you, without limit. Whatever ludicrous quantity you choose, for whatever private reason, a group of that many vectorlets can always be defined that combine to have precisely the magnitude and direction of the original single vector. Even though this fact is worth contemplating for a second or two, it's generally ignored, mainly because it is so useless in the practical sense ... it doesn't make a vector any easier to work with when it is replaced by 347 components, for example. The most useful number of components is: one for each dimension of the space in which the original vector lives. Two components to replace a vector on a flat graph, and three components to replace a vector in our world.
How resolution of vector is used in applying the component methods in adding vectors?
The related question has a nice detail of this. Each vector is resolved into component vectors. For 2-dimensions, it is an x-component and a y-component. Then the respective components are added. These added components make up the resultant vector.
What is the sum of two or more vectors added together called?
The sum of any number of vectors is itself a vector, just as the sum of any number of scalars (normal numbers) is a normal number.If a vector is resolved into 2 components, x and y, in the form [x,y], then it can be added to any other vector resolved into 2 components [z,a].[x,y]+[z,a]=[x+z,y+a]
The components of a vector or what?
The components of a vector are magnitude and direction.
What are the components of a vector?
The components of a vector are magnitude and direction.
What is difference in resultant vector and vector resolution?
the difference between resultant vector and resolution of vector is that the addition of two or more vectors can be represented by a single vector which is termed as a resultant vector. And the decomposition of a vector into its components is called resolution of vectors.
