No. Great Britain is much too large to fit into Central Park. Central Park is 3.41 square kilometers compared to Great Britain's 219,000 square kilometers.
That would depend on what size buildings you want to build.That would depend on what size buildings you want to build.That would depend on what size buildings you want to build.That would depend on what size buildings you want to build.
6
Mexico: 1,972,550 square kilometers (761,606 sq mi) California: 423,970 square kilometers (163,696 sq mi) 4.7 states the size of California could fit inside Mexico.
With 1,972,550 square kilometers (761,606 sq mi) vs. 104,659 square kilometers (40,409 sq mi), almost 19 states the size of Kentucky would fit inside Mexico.
With 1,972,550 square kilometers (761,606 sq mi) vs. 137,732 square kilometers (53,178 sq mi), over 14 states the size of Arkansas would fit inside Mexico.
Approximately 348.5 times. Australia is 7,692,024 square kilometers; Israel is 22,072 square kilometers. 7,692,024 divided by 22,072 is approximately 348.5.
England is approximately 130,395 square kilometers in size, while Victoria is about 237,635 square kilometers. Therefore, England would fit inside Victoria approximately 1.8 times.
With 1,972,550 square kilometers (761,606 sq mi) vs. 21,040 square kilometers (8,124 sq mi), almost 94 countries the size of El Salvador would fit inside Mexico.
If you are referring to land area, the Netherlands is 41,848 square kilometers. Scotland is larger at 78,772 square kilometers. So you could fit about 1.88 Netherlands into Scotland.
Germany could fit inside the United Staes 27.5 times.
The area of Oregon is about 255,000 square kilometers, while the area of Alberta is about 660,000 square kilometers. Therefore, the state of Oregon could fit into the province of Alberta slightly less than three times.