Top Answer

if the number is a 2 or more diget number, you add up all of the numbers in the number and when you have the sum, if the sum is divisible by 3 , the whole number is divisible by three

EX.

123=6, 6 is divisible by 3 so 123 is divisible by three

447=15 is divisible by 3 so 447 is divisible by 3

989=26 is *NOT* divisible by 3 so 989 is not divisible by three

this truly does work for every single number

🙏

0🤨

0😮

0😂

0Loading...

Bob-no Tail.

We can tell by applying the divisibility rules that 6 is not a factor of 208. For 208 to be a multiple of 6, it would have to be even and a multiple of three. Since the digits of 208 don't total a multiple of three, 208 is not a multiple of three and can't be a multiple of 6.

Three is not a multiple of six. Six is a multiple of three. And three is a factor of six.

No. Three is a factor of nine. Nine is a multiple of three.

it will not since it is not a multiple of 3. 99 is a multiple of three so the next multiple would be 102.

If you mean what is the multiple OF three, the answer is 9

xgsfdg

usually if you have bread or food with you or you have fed them before and they reconise you

3 is a multiple of 1 and it is a multiple of 3. 1 x 3 = 3 3 x 1 = 3

To be a multiple of 6 a number must be even and a multiple of 3.356 is not a multiple of three. The short cut to that is if the digits add up to a multiple of three then the original number is a multiple of 3.

No, 28 could not be a multiple of 3.No. 28 divided by three is not a whole number, so it is not a multiple of three.

The largest five-digit multiple of three is 99,999

999 is a three-digit multiple of 9

Think of any multiple of three. That number plus three is the next-higher multiple of three. Right? For example, 12 is a multiple of 3 (3 x 4). Add 3 and you get 15 (3 x 5). So 15 - 3 = a multiple of 3. Same thing will work with ANY multiple of 3, no matter how high you go. Can you see why?

If the sum of their digits is a multiple of three, the whole number is a multiple of three.

If the sum of the digits is a multiple of three, the whole number is a multiple of three.

Yes 642 is a multiple of three

Assuming you mean "divisible", yes it is. One dozen is twelve, so two dozen is twenty-four, which is a multiple of three. An easy way to test if a number is a multiple of three is by adding up the digits; if it gives you another multiple of three, you're dealing with a multiple of three (2 + 4 = 6, 6 is a multiple of three, so 24 is too)

It's got a reddish-orange breast and a black head. Its wings are grey and tipped black. It's quite small and round.

No.

No.

No.

No.

If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.

Three is a multiple of 3.