107 is much closer to zero thousand than it is to one thousand.
Well, considering it would have to be at least 500 to round up to the nearest thousand, I suppose the answer would be 0.
To round 472992 to the nearest ten thousand, you would look at the digit in the ten thousand place, which is 9. Since 9 is greater than 5, you would round up. Therefore, 472992 rounded to the nearest ten thousand would be 480000.
5000
To the nearest thousandth, 265.588 To the nearest thousand, zero.
If to the nearest thousand, yes.If to the nearest 500, no.
Well, considering it would have to be at least 500 to round up to the nearest thousand, I suppose the answer would be 0.
You would round it down to 49000.
already is rounded to the nearest thousand if nearest ten thousand it would be 12420000
1,409,836 rounded to the nearest thousand is 1,410,000.
To round 472992 to the nearest ten thousand, you would look at the digit in the ten thousand place, which is 9. Since 9 is greater than 5, you would round up. Therefore, 472992 rounded to the nearest ten thousand would be 480000.
5000
To the nearest thousandth, 265.588 To the nearest thousand, zero.
459 to the nearest ten thousand? (not thousandth?) 459 would round down to 0..
The wording of this question seems confusing. 5700 rounded to the nearest thousand would be 6000. So you appear to be looking for the largest and smallest whole numbers that would round to 6000.The smallest whole number that would round to 6000 would be 5500. 5499 if rounded to the nearest thousand would be 5000.The largest whole number that would round to 6000 would be 6499. 6500 if rounded to the nearest thousand would be 7000.
If to the nearest thousand, yes.If to the nearest 500, no.
You would round it up... to 9000
No number if rounded to the nearest thousand would round to 3600. If you had to round the number 3600 to the nearest thousand, it would be approximately equal to 4000.