This would indicate that there is a linear relationship between manipulating and responding variables.
If the variables are inversely related, doubling one will half the other.
The rate of growth and, unless the relationship is exponential, the frequency of each growth cycle.
When one is doubled, the other is doubled.
No, doubling the angle of incidence itself will not cause a doubling of the angle of refraction.
That is correct; to multiply by 2 and then multiply by 2 again is equivalent to multiplying by 4.
it is a direct relationship -eli martin
it is a direct relationship -eli martin
If the variables are inversely related, doubling one will half the other.
The second is halved.
The other variable is doubled
Assuming that you're talking about coils, it is a linear relationship: doubling the turns doubles the strength.
The rate of growth and, unless the relationship is exponential, the frequency of each growth cycle.
Doubling a number is equivalent to multiplying by 2. Doubling twice (doubling, and then doubling the result again) is equivalent to multiplying by 4. (Also, doubling three times is the same as multiplying by 8, doubling 4 times is the same as multiplying by 16, etc.)
When one is doubled, the other is doubled.
No, doubling the angle of incidence itself will not cause a doubling of the angle of refraction.
I'm not completely sure but I think it's like this. Doubling 1 would be 2. Doubling 2 would be 4. Doubling 4 would be 8. Doubling 8 would be 16. Doubling 16 would be 32. Doubling 32 would be 64. (
Doubling the radius quadruples the volume.