Best Answer

If the hypotenuse is the square root of three, then the legs are (root 6)/2.

If the hypotenuse is 12, then the legs are 6(root 2).

This is because, for any given right isosceles triangle, the length of the hypotenuse x is root two times the length of the legs.

Q: In an isosceles right triangle the hypotenuse is radical three and if the hypotenuse is 12 then what is the smaller leg of that triangle?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

An obtuse triangle or a right angle triangle. An equilateral is definitely an isoceles triangle * * * * * Not true. An obtuse or right angled triangles can be isosceles. It depends on the sizes of the two smaller angles. An isosceles triangle has two equal angles so a triangle with angles of size [A, (180-A)/2, (180-A)/2] degrees where 90 < A < 180 degrees would be an obtuse angled isosceles triangle. A triangle with angles of size (90, 45, 45) degrees is a right angled isosceles triangle.

The measure of the smaller acute angle of the triangle is: 17.46 degrees.

You need to know something else to solve: either the long leg or the angle edit: if it is a right triangle you can use a theorem to figure out the other sides. the smallest side is a, the hypotenuse is 2a, the longer leg is a * sqrt (3) if the hypotenuse is 20, the smaller leg is 10.

Yes providing the sum of its smaller sides is greater than its longest side which in this case will be the hypotenuse of a right angle triangle.

That is incorrect. An equilateral triangle is where ALLthe sides of the triangle are the same length. This results in all three of the internal angles being 60 degrees.However, a Isosceles triangle only has TWO sides that are the same length. This results in two of the internal angles being the same with and the other angle being a smaller angle to add up to the 180 degrees.

Related questions

An isosceles triangle can be divided into 4 smaller, identical isosceles triangles. Each of these can then be divided into 4, and each of them ... So, the answer to the question is infinitely many.

There are normally no parallelograms within an isosceles triangle unless you put them there yourself.

An obtuse triangle or a right angle triangle. An equilateral is definitely an isoceles triangle * * * * * Not true. An obtuse or right angled triangles can be isosceles. It depends on the sizes of the two smaller angles. An isosceles triangle has two equal angles so a triangle with angles of size [A, (180-A)/2, (180-A)/2] degrees where 90 < A < 180 degrees would be an obtuse angled isosceles triangle. A triangle with angles of size (90, 45, 45) degrees is a right angled isosceles triangle.

No any leg of a right angle triangle is smaller than the length of its hypotenuse

The measure of the smaller acute angle of the triangle is: 17.46 degrees.

The TOTAL of the three corners in EVERY triangle is ALWAYS 1800Two corners of an isosceles triangle have the same value and need to be smaller than 900because:(>00) + 2*(

You need to know something else to solve: either the long leg or the angle edit: if it is a right triangle you can use a theorem to figure out the other sides. the smallest side is a, the hypotenuse is 2a, the longer leg is a * sqrt (3) if the hypotenuse is 20, the smaller leg is 10.

Yes providing the sum of its smaller sides is greater than its longest side which in this case will be the hypotenuse of a right angle triangle.

the square root of 133

That is incorrect. An equilateral triangle is where ALLthe sides of the triangle are the same length. This results in all three of the internal angles being 60 degrees.However, a Isosceles triangle only has TWO sides that are the same length. This results in two of the internal angles being the same with and the other angle being a smaller angle to add up to the 180 degrees.

If it is an isosceles triangle then the missing side is 40 cm but for any triangle the sum of its two smaller sides must be greater than its longest side.

Yes. If the sum of the length of the two smaller sides are greater than the length of the larger side and none of the lengths of any of the sides equals 0, then it is a triangle. It is not, however, an equilateral triangle or right triangle (that would be 5, 4, 3), though it is an isosceles triangle.