No because integers can not contain decimals.
63 is an integer and not a fraction.
-36
Since 63 is an integer, it is already in decimal form.
9
63 is an integer is not really suitable for writing as a fraction. However, if you must, it is 63/1
63 is an integer, not a fraction.
63 is an integer and not a fraction.
Since 63 is an integer, it is already in decimal form.
-36
63 will divide any multiple of 63, that is, any number of the form 63*k where k is an integer.
The greatest integer remainder for a division sum with a divisor of 63 would be 62 - for a number one fewer than an integer multiple of 63 - for example, 125/63 = 1 remainder 62.
To the nearest integer, 63
9
63 is an integer is not really suitable for writing as a fraction. However, if you must, it is 63/1
Because 63 is the smallest positive integer that both of those numbers divide into evenly with no remainder.
There is no particular meaning. It is the integer that is the successor to 62.
9