No - the nearest big number divisible by 3 is 1200
- which is 40 more than 1160
As 40 is not divisible by 3 then also 1160 is not.
It can be divided into any of its multiples with no remainders.
The multiples of 145 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 145 , including these: 290, 435, 580, 725, 870, 1015, 1160, 1305, 1450 . . .
10% off of 1160 = 1044= 10% discount applied to 1160= 1160 - (10% * 1160)= 1160 - (0.10 * 1160)= 1160 - 116= 1044
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
1160 000 000
It can be divided into any of its multiples with no remainders.
The multiples of 145 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 145 , including these: 290, 435, 580, 725, 870, 1015, 1160, 1305, 1450 . . .
10% off of 1160 = 1044= 10% discount applied to 1160= 1160 - (10% * 1160)= 1160 - (0.10 * 1160)= 1160 - 116= 1044
The multiples of 145 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 145, including these: 145, 290, 435, 580, 725, 870, 1015, 1160, 1305 . . .
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
The answer depends on the units used for 1160. It should be pretty obvious that 1160 seconds, 1160 months and 1160 millennia, for example, will give three very different answers.
1160/5 = 232
35% of 1160 is 406
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.