blank = 2 is a possible answer.
Its the remainder
Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.
35 is not divisible by 3.
If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3.
blank = 2 is a possible answer.
Let's assume, or hope, that the blank is after those numbers. 67_ and 45_ For a number to be divisible by three, the total of the number's digits has to be divisible by three. 672 and 450
You would fill in the blank with the word sum, which means that you add each of the digits of the number. If that sum is divisible by three then the number is divisible by 3.
2. To test a number to be divisible by 3, add up the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number. If not, the excess over a multiple of 3 gives the remainder when the original number is divided by 3. Subtract this remainder from 3 and this gives the smallest digit to replace the blank; unless the remainder is 0, in which case the blank can be replaced by a 0: 8 + 6 + 9 + 3 + 5 = 31 → 31 ÷ 3 = 10 remainder 1 Replace blank by 3 - 1 = 2: 826935 is divisible by 3
remainder
A number is divisible by another when the remainder after division by that number is zero.
Its the remainder
Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.
35 is not divisible by 3.
If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3.
There is no such number. Since 6 is divisible by 3, then any number that is divisible by 6 automatically has to be divisible by 3.
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.