no, just four - it could be divided by 8, but the answer wouldn't be a whole number.
No. The reverse is true, but 12 is divisible by 4 and not by 8.
All numbers that are divisible by 8 and 12 would also be divisible by 4.
No - every other multiple of 4 is 4 12 20 28 etc are divisible by 4 but not by 8
Every other number: 8, 16, 24, 32, 40... No, a number can be divisible by 4 but not divisible by 8; an example is 12.
12
...-20, -16, -12, -8, -4, 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20,....
The divisibility rule for 4 states that a number is divisible by 4 if the last two digits of the number form a number that is divisible by 4. For example, 512 is divisible by 4 because the last two digits, 12, are divisible by 4 (12 ÷ 4 = 3). The rule for 8 states that a number is divisible by 8 if the last three digits of the number form a number that is divisible by 8. For example, 1,024 is divisible by 8 because the last three digits, 024, are divisible by 8 (24 ÷ 8 = 3).
The smallest number divisible by 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 is 840.
Multiples of 4 4, 8, 12, 16 and so on.
Numbers that are divisible by 2 through the number 12 are: 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12.
The numbers that are divisible by four are infinite. Five of them are: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20.
Look at 12. Not divisible by 8 but divisible by 4 and 2. Look at 4. Same thing. The equation 8x-4 will give you any number divisible by 4 and 2, but not 8 32 is divisable by all three. 8x4=32, 2x16=32