Negative 13 is an integer, not a fraction.
-7(13) = -91 is an integer, not a fraction!
No, it is an integer.
13 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction. However, if you must, you can use (13*k)/k where k is any non-zero integer as an equivalent fraction.
13 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 13/1.
Since 13 is an integer, there is no real fraction for it. But you can go with 13/1
13 is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
-13 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as -13/1 or, in the form of an improper fraction as -13 and 0/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.
Pick any integer n, greater than 1. Then (n*13)/(n*14) is an equivalent fraction.
It is a fraction. For it to be a mixed number, the integer part of the number would have to be non-zero.
seeing as 13 is an integer, the only fraction it can really be is 13/1, which is still just 13. though i don't really understand the question, since fractions are usually for non-integers13 = 13/1 in fraction