Integer.
-7(13) = -91 is an integer, not a fraction!
No, it is an integer.
13 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction. However, if you must, you can use (13*k)/k where k is any non-zero integer as an equivalent fraction.
13 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 13/1.
Since 13 is an integer, there is no real fraction for it. But you can go with 13/1
13 is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
-13 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as -13/1 or, in the form of an improper fraction as -13 and 0/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.24 is an integer. As a fraction, it is 24/1.
Negative 13 can be expressed as an improper fraction as -13/1. This is because the numerator, which is -13, is greater than the denominator, which is 1. In fraction form, this would be read as negative thirteen over one.
Pick any integer n, greater than 1. Then (n*13)/(n*14) is an equivalent fraction.
a negative integer or a fraction (as in 1/integer) or a negative fraction (as in -1/integer).
Yes. eg: a fraction -4/2 = -2 an integer