No. All three are not prime numbers. A Prime number is a number that is only divisible by itself and 1. 15 can be divided by 1, 3, 5 and 15 16 can be divided by 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 18 can be divided by 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 18.
a prime number that's ONLY multiples are itself and 1. example:4*4=16 3*5=15 9*2=18 1*17=17
Prime factors of 18 are 2 and 3 Prime factors of 15 are 3 and 5
To have a gcf of 18 they must have one factor of 18 in common and no other factor, ie the second factor of the numbers must be relatively prime. The multiples of 18 between 200 and 300 are: 12 x 18 = 216 13 x 18 = 234 14 x 18 = 252 15 x 18 = 270 16 x 18 = 288 12 is relatively prime to 13 13 is relatively prime to 14, 15 & 16 14 is relatively prime to 15 15 is relatively prime to 16 (Pairs of numbers are being considered, so as 12 is relatively prime to 13, 13 is also relatively prime to 12 and thus is only listed when the numbers increase, ie under 12 and not under 13.) Thus the pairs: 216 & 234 234 & 252 234 & 270 234 & 288 252 & 270 270 & 288 all have a gcf of 18.
13 is prime 14=2x7, 2 factors 15=3x5, 2 factors 16=24, 4 factors 17 is prime 18=2x32, 3 factors 19 is prime So the answer is 3 (14, 15 and 16)
The numbers between 10 and 20 that are not prime are 12, 14, 15, 16 and 18. So 15 is the odd number and the rest are even numbers.
19 is prime.
15 is not a prime number, so it can't be a prime factor.
No.
its 36
They are: 4 6 8 9 10 12 14 15 16 18.
4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20
The prime factors of 15 are 3 and 5. The prime factors of 18 are 2 and 3. The highest power of each of these is 1.