No, any repeating decimal digit is a rational number. It only states that it is non-terminating decimal. It is rational.
No. It could be a rational or an irrational
An irrational number must not have a repeating sequence. If we have a number, such as 0.333333...., we can turn this into a rational number as such.Let x = 0.333333......, then multiply both sides by 10:10x = 3.333333......Now subtract the first equation from the second, since the 3's go on forever, they will cancel each other out and you're left with:9x = 3. Now divide both sides by 9: x = 3/9 which is 1/3, a rational number equal to 0.3333333....If a number can be expressed as the ratio a/b, where a and b are integers (with the restriction that b not equal zero), then the number is rational. If you cannot express the number as such, then it is irrational.
Yes, it does.
yes
There are essentially three forms:Terminating decimals: 386 or 23.567,Recurring decimals: 36.572343434... (with 34 repeating),Non-terminating infinite decimals: these represent irrational numbers for which the digits after the decimal point go on for ever without falling into a repeating pattern.
Actually, a repeating decimal is not necessarily an irrational number. A repeating decimal is a decimal number that has a repeating pattern of digits after the decimal point. While some repeating decimals can be irrational, such as 0.1010010001..., others can be rational, like 0.3333... which is equal to 1/3. Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed as a simple fraction, and they have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal representations.
Any repeating decimal digits (this includes repetition after a certain point, e.g. 2.4510101010...) is a rational number.
81 as well as all whole numbers are rational numbers. Any number that can be written as a fraction is a rational number. An irrational number can be written as a decimal, but not as a fraction. An irrational number has endless non-repeating digits to the right of the decimal point. An example of an irrational number would be pi: π = 3.141592…
No. It could be a rational or an irrational
An irrational number must not have a repeating sequence. If we have a number, such as 0.333333...., we can turn this into a rational number as such.Let x = 0.333333......, then multiply both sides by 10:10x = 3.333333......Now subtract the first equation from the second, since the 3's go on forever, they will cancel each other out and you're left with:9x = 3. Now divide both sides by 9: x = 3/9 which is 1/3, a rational number equal to 0.3333333....If a number can be expressed as the ratio a/b, where a and b are integers (with the restriction that b not equal zero), then the number is rational. If you cannot express the number as such, then it is irrational.
None, since 57 is NOT an irrational number.
Any number with a defined end point, including 2.14, is a rational number.
It is rational.A number cannot be both rational and irrational.
An Irrational Number is a Number that cannot be converted to a Fraction and has an unstoppable amount of numbers after the decimal point. For Example, Pi is the most famous irrational number. If I didn't answer your question, search up Irrational Numbers.
This number is rational: If the number is exact as given, without the final period/decimal point, it is rational because it can be written with a finite number of digits. If the number is intended to be indicated as the repeating decimal -155.23333333..., then it is rational because numbers that can be written as repeating decimals are rational; this particular one is the sum of -155.2 - (3/100), which can be written as -15523/100.
There is no number which can be rational and irrational so there is no point in asking "how".
Yes.