Yes it is.. the answer is 833 exactly.
Multiples of 1666, like 1666, 3332, 4998 and so on.
3+6+9+...+4998 = 3(1+2+3+...+1666) =3 x 1666(1666+1)/2 = 4165833
2 x 7 x 7 x 17 = 1666
The Great Fire of London started in 1666.
no. there's 2
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
A number which is divisible by both 2 & 3 is a multiple of 6 i.e. the number is divisible by 6.So, we need to find out the smallest 5 digit number divisible by 6(or 2 & 3).Smallest 5 digit number = 10000Dividing 10000 by 6, we get10000 = 6 x 1666 + 49996 = 6 x 1666If we add 6 to 9996 we obtain a number which is divisible by 6.6 + 9996 = 10002(divisible by 6).So, the smallest five digit number divisible by 6 is 10002.==========================================Here is another one that's smaller than 10,002 and satisfiesthe other specifications stated in the question:6.0000
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)