answersLogoWhite

0

Is 169 a composite number

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Best Answer

Yes, it is divisible by 13 (it is 13 squared).

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is 169 a composite number
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is 169 prime or composite?

169 is composite because if you do (13*13) it on a calculator then you will figure out that 169 is composite.


Is 169 is a prime or composite number?

A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 169 is composite.


Is 169 a prime number or a composite number?

169 is divisible by 13 in addition to 1 and itself. It is not prime.


Is 169 a prime?

A prime number is a number that is divisible only by 1 and itself; it has no other factors. The factors of 169 are 1, 13, and 169. Therefore, 169 is not a prime number. It is a composite number.


Is 169 a prime number in math?

No because 169 has more than two factors which makes it a composite number in math


Is 169 a composite?

Yes.


Is 2873 a prime number?

2873 is a composite number, not a prime. Its factors are 1, 13, 17, 169, 221, and 2873, and its prime factorization is 13x13x17.


Is 507 composite or prime?

507 is composite. It is divisible by 3, 13, 39, and 169, as well as by 1 and itself.


How many composite numbers 1-1000?

Of the 1,000 numbers from 1 to 1,000, 168 are primes and one (the number 1) is neither composite nor prime. Subtracting the 169 numbers that are not composites leaves 831 composuite numbers from 1 to 1,000 (1,000 - 169 = 831).


Is 1521 a prime number?

1521 is a composite number. Its positive integer factors are: 1, 3, 9, 13, 39, 117, 169, 507, 1521


What are two composite numbers greater than 17?

150 and 169.


Is 169 a prime number number?

169 is not a prime number. it can be divided by 13. 169 / 13 = 13. so actually 13 would be the square root of 169.No, it is 13 x 13