Nope. 299 divided by 2 is 149.5
1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 11, 18, 22, 27, 33, 54, 66, 99, 198, 297, 594
(299+111)/2 = 410/2 = 205
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 16, 23, 26, 46, 52, 92, 104, 184, 208, 299, 368, 598, 1196, 2392, 4784.
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3