1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 11, 18, 22, 27, 33, 54, 66, 99, 198, 297, 594
(299+111)/2 = 410/2 = 205
1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 16, 23, 26, 46, 52, 92, 104, 184, 208, 299, 368, 598, 1196, 2392, 4784.
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
Concurrently, the top ten bowling series without a 300 game would be:1. 897 (299, 299, 299)2. 896 (299, 299, 298)3. 895 (299, 299, 297)4. 8945. 8936. 8927. 8918. 8909. 88910. 888 (299, 299, 290)
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3