No.
The only time that such a statement might be true is in the absolute scale for temperature - which is measured in Kelvin (not degree Kelvin).
Degrees Celsius are always 'hotter' than degrees Fahrenheit: 100ºC = 212.00ºF
80 degrees Celsius is hotter than 20 degrees Celsius. (Higher positive numbers are hotter temperatures on all modern scales.)
97 degrees Celsius is hotter than 97 degrees Fahrenheit.
Since Celsius degrees are larger than Fahrenheit degrees, above -40 degrees (where the scales coincide) any number in Celsius will be hotter than the corresponding number in Fahrenheit.
No, its colder. Water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit and 0 degrees Celsius, so 5 degrees Celsius would be hotter.
It is 3 times hotter than the boiling point of water, it is 572 degrees Fahrenheit and 573 degrees Kelvin.
-183 degrees Celsius is hotter than -193C by 10 degrees.
Degrees Celsius are always 'hotter' than degrees Fahrenheit: 100ºC = 212.00ºF
Yes, From what i know Red Flames are 1800F...Orange is 2200F... and White is 2700F. I'm Trying to Find out how much it Need for a Pure Blue Fire
Three lines, ALL wrong. 90C = 194F so the answer is NO! Besides that "<" is less than, and ">" is greater than!
It's 54,000 degrees Fahrenheit! That's a super hot degrees! It's five times hotter than our sun!
yes. seven is hotter than 2 million degrees.
No. It's just six degrees hotter. The relationship is additive, not multiplicative. They are points on a continuous scale and not discrete countable quantities like eight objects.
No it is not. the suns core is 15 million degrees Celsius. Lightning does not even come close to that hot. Lightning is, however, about 5 times hotter than the surface of the sun.
80 degrees Celsius is hotter than 20 degrees Celsius. (Higher positive numbers are hotter temperatures on all modern scales.)
The answer depends on hotter than WHAT!
97 degrees Celsius is hotter than 97 degrees Fahrenheit.