Unfortunately, the least common multiple in this case is rather large. 468 is the smallest number that is divisible by both 13 and 36. 36 is already divisible by 3 so 3 does not matter for this problem. 13 is prime and is not a factor of 36 so the first multiple of 13 that is divisible by 36 is 13 * 36 which is 468.
yes because 13 x 2 is 36
36 is divisible by itself but not 8 36/36=1 36/8=4.5
help me
No.First off, 120 is not divisible by 9. (The sum of the digits of 120 is "3"; a number is divisible by nine if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by nine.) For that matter, it's not divisible by 36 either; since 36 is itself divisible by 9, any number which is not divisible by 9 cannot be divisible by 36.The smallest number that's divisible by 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 is "36" (it's also divisible by 4, which you left out).
No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.
13 is prime. It is divisible by 1 and 13.
36 = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 & 36 * * * * * Wrong. These are number that divide 36 not numbers that are divisible by 36! Numbers that are divisible by 36 are the numbers in the 36 times table: 36, 72 , 108, 144, 180 etc.
The multiples of 36 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 36, including these: 36, 72, 108, 144, 180, 216, 252, 288 . . .
13 and all its multiples are divisible by 13.
306 is not divisible by 13.
36, 72,108,144 ------------------- 4x9=36, now multiples of 36 will always be divisible by 4 and 9