No.
Unfortunately, the least common multiple in this case is rather large. 468 is the smallest number that is divisible by both 13 and 36. 36 is already divisible by 3 so 3 does not matter for this problem. 13 is prime and is not a factor of 36 so the first multiple of 13 that is divisible by 36 is 13 * 36 which is 468.
yes because 13 x 2 is 36
36 is divisible by itself but not 8 36/36=1 36/8=4.5
help me
No.First off, 120 is not divisible by 9. (The sum of the digits of 120 is "3"; a number is divisible by nine if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by nine.) For that matter, it's not divisible by 36 either; since 36 is itself divisible by 9, any number which is not divisible by 9 cannot be divisible by 36.The smallest number that's divisible by 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 is "36" (it's also divisible by 4, which you left out).
36 = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 & 36 * * * * * Wrong. These are number that divide 36 not numbers that are divisible by 36! Numbers that are divisible by 36 are the numbers in the 36 times table: 36, 72 , 108, 144, 180 etc.
No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.No. 29 is a prime number; 36 is not divisible by 29.
13 is prime. It is divisible by 1 and 13.
The multiples of 36 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 36, including these: 36, 72, 108, 144, 180, 216, 252, 288 . . .
13 and all its multiples are divisible by 13.
306 is not divisible by 13.
2970/36 = 82.5