Not evenly because it will have a remainder
457*3 = 1371
Yes, if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is also divisible by 3. This is because for any integer x, x^2 will also be divisible by 3 if x is divisible by 3. This can be proven using the property that the square of any integer divisible by 3 will also be divisible by 3.
All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.
Not evenly. A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.
1, 3, 9, 457, 1371, 4113
457 is prime. It is only evenly divisible by itself and one.
457*3 = 1371
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
no because the last number of 457 is seven and 7 does not devide equaliy into 3. so it is not a factor of 457
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
By lomg multipliction 457 x23 9140 ( 20 X 457) (Multiply by '2' and add a '0' on the right hand end). 1371 (3 x 457) _____ (+) 10511 ====== The answer!!!!
Yes, if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is also divisible by 3. This is because for any integer x, x^2 will also be divisible by 3 if x is divisible by 3. This can be proven using the property that the square of any integer divisible by 3 will also be divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.
1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????