If sum of digits of a number is divisible by 3 then the number is divisible by 3.
Sum of digits = 5+1+8 = 14 and 14 is not divisible by 3.
So 518 is not divisible by 3.
No
9,842 is divisible by: 1, 2, 7, 14, 19, 37, 38, 74, 133, 259, 266, 518, 703, 1406, 4921 and 9842.
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.
Not evenly. A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
No. To be divisible by 6, a number must be even (divisible by 2) and divisible by 3. Although 3058 is even, it is not divisible by 3 since 3+0+5+8 = 16 which is not divisible by 3. Thus is it not divisible by 6.
518 is only divisible by 2
No - a number cannot be smaller than its divisor.
The multiples of 74 (which are infinite) are all divisible by 74, including these: 74, 148, 222, 296, 370, 444, 518, 592, 666 . . .
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
9,842 is divisible by: 1, 2, 7, 14, 19, 37, 38, 74, 133, 259, 266, 518, 703, 1406, 4921 and 9842.
It is: 1554
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.
1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????