No.
No.
573, aka 1*573. 1146, aka 2*573. 1719, aka 3*573. Are you sensing a pattern here?
For a number to be divisible by 3, its digit sum has to be divisible by 3. For a number not to be divisible by 2, the last digit must be a 1,3,5,7 or 9. Using these rules, the numbers between 500 and 600 that divide by 3 but not 2 become clear: 501, 507, 513, 519, 525, 531, 537, 543, 549, 555, 561, 567, 573, 579, 585, 591 and 597
yes any number that ends in 5 or 0 is evenly divisble by 5 2865/5=573
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.
402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.