0
No, they are not relatively prime.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are numbers 27 and 70 relatively prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 27 and 70 relatively prime?
No. they are not
Are 32 and 65 relatively prime?
Yes.
Is 70 and 195 relatively prime numbers?
No.No.No.No.
Are 26 and 65 relatively prime?
No. They have a common factor, 13. 26 = 13 x 2 65 = 13 x 5 Numbers are relatively prime if they have no common factors other than 1, i.e. that they have no prime number factors in common.
Are 14 and 35 relatively prime?
No, 65 and 70 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 65 and 70 also have 5 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.
Are 50 and 65 relatively prime?
No, 50 and 65 are not relatively prime.
Is 70 and 195 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are numbers 27 and 70 relatively prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Is 30 and 65 relatively prime?
No.
Are 36 and 65 relativly prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 21 and 70 relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Are 27 and 70 relatively prime?
No. they are not
Are 52 and 65 relatively prime?
yes
Are 32 and 65 relatively prime?
Yes.
Is the greatest common factor of 26 and 65 relatively prime?
The GCF of 26 and 65 is 13. 13 is a prime number. "Relatively prime" refers to numbers whose GCF is 1.
Are 65 and 112 relatively prime?
Yes. hcf(65, 112) = 1.
