answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No, 65 and 70 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 65 and 70 also have 5 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

No, they are both divisible by seven.

User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Yes, they are.

User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

yes

User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are 14 and 35 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is 14 and 35 relatively prime?

No, they are not.


Are 35 and 54 relatively prime?

Yes, 35 and 54 are relatively prime.


Are 35 and 135 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 10 and 35 relatively prime?

10 and 35 are not relatively prime because they share the prime factor 5.


Is 34 relatively prime?

It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.


Is 25 a relatively prime?

25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.


Are the numbers 6 and 35 relatively prime?

Yes, 6 and 35 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors


Is 12 and 35 relatively prime?

12 and 35 are NOT prime numbers.


Is 14 and 27 relatively prime?

Yes, they are relatively prime.


Is 35 and 110 relatively prime?

No.


Is 28 and 35 relatively prime?

No, they are not.


Is 35 and 36 relatively prime?

no