Best Answer

No neither of them are because 3x3=9 so it is not prime. 8 is not either because 2x4=8

Q: Is 9 and 8 relatively prime?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Yes, they are relatively prime.

You might be thinking of relatively prime numbers. Two numbers are considered relatively prime if their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.

No.

Two numbers are considered relatively prime when their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.

Not necessarily. 4 and 9 are relatively prime and both are composite.

Related questions

Yes.

Yes, 9 and 23 are relatively prime.

Nine can only be relatively prime when compared to another number or set of numbers. 9 is relatively prime to 4, 9 is not relatively prime to 12.

9 and 16 are relatively prime.

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.

Yes, they are relatively prime.

The GCF of 9 and 26 is 1. 9 and 26 are relatively prime.

Yes, 9 and 16 are relatively prime. They do not have any prime factors in common.

All numbers not divisible by 3 or 9 are relatively prime to 9. This would include 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, etc.

Two numbers are considered relatively prime if their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.

Numbers are co-prime, or relatively prime, if their GCF is 1. 4 and 9 are relatively prime.

No.