27 is not a Prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite #
* * * * *
The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter.
Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means.
117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise.
27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
Yes, 4 and 21 are relatively prime. Numbers that are relatively prime only have the number 1 as a common factor. That is the case with 4 and 21.
No, 56 is not prime.
1, 3, 7, 21 3 and 7 are prime. 3 x 7 is the prime factorization. No exponents are required.
Numbers that are relatively prime to 7 are numbers that have no common factors other than 1 with 7. The numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are relatively prime to 7 because they do not share any common factors with 7. These numbers are not divisible by 7 and have a greatest common divisor of 1 with 7.
No, 14 and 21 are not relatively prime. They share the factor 7.No.
No.
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
21 = 3 x 7 39 = 3 x 13 So 21 and 39 are not relatively prime as they are sharing a common factor: 3
Yes, 15 and 21 are relatively prime because they have no common positive factors other than 1. The prime factorization of 15 is 3 and 5, while the prime factorization of 21 is 3 and 7. The only common factor is 3, which means they are not relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.