27 is not a Prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite #
* * * * *
The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter.
Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means.
117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise.
27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
Yes, 4 and 21 are relatively prime. Numbers that are relatively prime only have the number 1 as a common factor. That is the case with 4 and 21.
No, 56 is not prime.
Any prime number is relatively prime to 7, such as 2, 3, 5, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, ... Because 7 is a prime number, any number that does not have 7 as a factor is relatively prime to 7, such as 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, ...
1, 3, 7, 21 3 and 7 are prime. 3 x 7 is the prime factorization. No exponents are required.
No, 14 and 21 are not relatively prime. They share the factor 7.No.
No.
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
21 = 3 x 7 39 = 3 x 13 So 21 and 39 are not relatively prime as they are sharing a common factor: 3
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, 4 and 21 are relatively prime. Numbers that are relatively prime only have the number 1 as a common factor. That is the case with 4 and 21.