Well, honey, the statement that division of a whole number is associative is as false as claiming you can wear a swimsuit in a blizzard. Just take the numbers 10, 5, and 2 for example. (10 ÷ 5) ÷ 2 is not the same as 10 ÷ (5 ÷ 2). So, there you have it - a sassy counterexample for you!
Properties are true statements for any numbers. There are three basic properties of numbers: Associative, Commutative, and Distributive Properties.
No, Associative proporties are not true for all integers. The deffinition for integer (n) 1. one of the positive or negative numbers 1, 2, 3, act., or zero. Compare whole number.
The associative property of multiplication states that for any three numbers a, b and c, (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) and so we can write either as a * b * c without ambiguity. By way of contrast, this is not true for division: 75 / (15/5) = 75 / 3 = 25 but (75/15) / 3 = 5/3 = 1.66...
If it were not true, it would not have become the rule!
(75/25) / 5 = 3/5 = 0.6 75 / (25/5) = 75/5 = 15
True. Addition of natural numbers obeys associative and commutative property.
FALSE .... by division.
i for one believe it is false
True. Classic associative vs. partial associative logic. Yea, what she said. true
No. 2/4 is not an even number.
associative_is_grouping_same_order_and_commutative_is_the_order_switched_">associative is grouping same order and commutative is the order switched* * * * *Sadly, all that is rubbish.Commutativity: The order of operands can be changed without affecting the result.Associativity: The order of operations can be changed without affecting the result.Thus, the commutative property states thatx + y = y + x.The associative property states that(a + b) + c = a + (b + c) and so you can write either as a + b + c without ambiguity.Although these may seem pretty basic or obvious, they are not true for operations as basic as subtraction or division of ordinary numbers.while the associative property