Yes. Person A is an 'eye-witness'. His testimony is admissible as evidence because he was present when person B assaulted person C.
A witness
Corroborating evidence (in "corroboration") is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition. For example, W, a witness, testifies that she saw X drive his automobile into a green car. Meanwhile Y, another witness, testifies that when he examined X's car, later that day, he noticed green paint on its fender
They're allowed to cross-examine him. The witness is called to the stand - and gives their account of what they saw. The opposing counsel then has the chance to question the witness - in an attempt to disprove their evidence.
YES,in a show live !!! I saw that !!!
No, a witness testifying that they personally saw the defendant strike the plaintiff is not considered hearsay. Hearsay involves relaying information heard from someone else outside of the courtroom. Since the witness is providing firsthand knowledge of the event, their testimony is typically admissible as direct evidence.
Mayella testifies that Tom Robinson assaulted her, while her father, Bob Ewell, testifies that he saw Tom Robinson through the window assaulting her. However, their testimonies contradict each other on key details, such as the side of the face Mayella was injured on and whether Bob Ewell heard or saw the assault.
By "real evidence" I assume you mean evidence given by a witness verbally under oath on the witness stand. That is called testimonial evidence. In any event there are two types of evidence. One is testimonial evidence and one is demonstrative evidence. Testimonial evidence is simply evidence given by a person testifying verbally under oath or affirmation. Demonstrative evidence is taken from inanimate objects that demonstrate some particular fact. In a typical Law and Order episode the witness who testifies he saw the defendant shoot the victim is providing testimonial evidence. Exhibit A, the murder weapon with the defendant's fingerprints on it is demonstrative evidence, because it demonstrates that the defendant had the weapon in his hand. Both are real evidence as the defendant will shortly be very unhappy to learn.
In "To Kill a Mockingbird," the evidence of the trial where Bob Ewell accuses Tom Robinson of beating his daughter, Mayella, can be found in Chapter 17. Bob Ewell testifies that he saw Tom Robinson assaulting Mayella, but Atticus Finch presents evidence showing that Tom Robinson's left hand is disabled, making it physically impossible for him to have been the one who caused Mayella's injuries.
A person who testifies against you is often called a "perjurer" or "liar." (wink)AnswerThe opposing party's witnesses are generally called to testify against you. If you are being tried criminally, they are often called "State's witnesses."
Try the British Museum. I saw his death mask there and bet they have primary evidence from him.
I would give him a slap , for spoiling my sleep.
not committing a fallacy