No. (We'd like to explain why, but the question doesn't permit it.)
You check out the speed and direction, and times them together, and it will tell you the velocity of the object.
Their 'sizes' are. But if you want it to be a velocity, thenyou also have to tell the direction of the speed.
If you call it "velocity" then you have to tell what direction it points.If you only tell how fast it is but you don't tell the direction, then it's "speed", not velocity.
Distance alone is not enough to tell you velocity final. (If it could, then all of the thousands of runners who finish in the same marathon would all cross the finish line at the same speed.) Besides distance, you would also need velocity initial, and either acceleration or time.
The speed and direction of an object is its velocity.
Velocity tells us the speed at which an object is moving and the direction in which it is moving.
Velocity tells you the speed of an object in a specific direction, while speed only tells you the how fast it is moving regardless of direction. Velocity is a vector quantity, combining speed with direction, whereas speed is a scalar quantity.
88 mph is 88 miles per hour, since that doesn't tell you what direction it is going it is speed. Velocity is speed and direction.
The x-t graph can't tell you anything about direction, so you can only make observations regarding speed, not velocity. For constant speed, the x-t graph is a straight line. The slope of the line is numerically equal to the constant speed.
Speed and direction combined produce velocity, which is a vectory notation.
Velocity tells us the speed of an object's motion as well as its direction of movement.
Add to it some kind of label to tell the directionof the speed.