30 is an integer and not a fraction. An integer cannot be reduced.
A fraction cannot be an integer. An integer, such as 3, may be written as a fraction ie 9/3 or 15/5. But these are not really fractions, they are integers written in fractional form.A proper fraction cannot be an integer, but yuo can always write any integer as a fraction.For example, 7 = 7/1 or 35/5.
A negative integer cannot BE a fraction, but it can be part of a fraction.
No! The term "integer" refers to something whole in itself, or in math, a whole number. Therefore, a fraction cannot be an integer.
258 is an integer, not a fraction. It cannot be reduced.
25 is an integer and cannot be reduced as a fraction.
50 is an integer, not a fraction. So it cannot be changed to a fraction.
The given number is a fraction. It cannot be made into an integer.
There is none. A single integer cannot have a common fraction.
Statement 1 is true but totally unnecessary. As integer is always a rational and you do not need to convert it to a fraction to determine whether or not it is rational. A negative fraction is can be rational or irrational. The fact that it is negative is irrelevant to its rationality. An integer number over a zero denominator is not defined and so cannot be rational or irrational or anything. It just isn't.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction. Any number that is a fraction is not an integer, but rational.
Rational number: A number that can be in fraction form. Therefore, 0.86 is a rational number (fraction: 86/100). Integer: Whole numbers (cannot be represented in fraction or decimal form) Therefore, it is true that 0.86 is not an integer. Hope this helps. -babyhamsterx
225 is an integer and so cannot be reduced.225 is an integer and so cannot be reduced.225 is an integer and so cannot be reduced.225 is an integer and so cannot be reduced.
851 is an integer and cannot be written as a proper fraction.
610 is an integer and so cannot be represented as a decimal fraction.
You cannot, because 970 is an integer, not a fraction.
68 is an integer, not a fraction and there is no sensible way to express it as a fraction. And since it is not a fraction, it cannot be simplified.
224 is an integer, not a fraction and there is no sensible way to express it as a fraction. Consequently, you cannot simplify it.
146 is an integer and so cannot be expressed as a decimal fraction.
666666667 is an integer and so cannot really be expressed as a fraction.0.666666667 = 666666667/1000000000.
4464 is an integer and cannot be reduced.
2025 is an integer and, therefore, cannot be reduced.
It is 13000, which is an integer and cannot be simplified.
Any fraction p/q where p is an integer and q is a non-zero integer is rational.
A mixed number needs to be made up of two parts: an integer and a fraction. Since there must be a fraction part, it cannot be an integer.