No, there is no reason why you should fail in this case.
Not you will but you can.
No.
It depends on what you mean. If you mean "more likely to fail chemistry and physics than to fail mathematics", then the answer is presumably yes. If you mean "more likely to fail chemistry and physics than some bozo who can't figure out how this 'multiplication' thing works", then no. In physics and (most kinds of) chemistry, a solid understanding of mathematics can only be helpful.
Mathematics is an important part of all the other sciences such as chemistry and thermodynamics; mathematics has rightly been called the language of science. So no, being good at math does not mean that you will fail chemistry, quite the opposite.
No, it is not true. It is false. In order to PASS physics, chemistry, and engineering, you must be pretty good at mathematics.
no
No, you will fail those subject that you do not study for. Passing or failing is in your hands not "fate".
None of those talents or shortcomings is a reliable predictor. You will fail Physics, Chemistry, Engineering, or any other specialty, if you expect it to be so hard that you'll fail it, or if you expect it to be so easy that you'll sail through without work. The decision to fail it or not fail it is your decision to make, and has no connection with what you think you're good at or not good at.
A student may fail mathematics because he/she did not study, did not attend class, or did not understand the lesson material.
Obviously, in order to pass an examination in chemistry, physics or an engineering subject, you'd need to know something about the chosen subject beyond mathematics. However, all sciences heavily rely and use a lot of mathematics. You will find passing any such examination really difficult without a sound mathematical background. Therefore, the answer to this question is No. Being an expert mathematician will be beneficial when studying any science or engineering subject, and not being good at mathematics will be a marked disadvantage.
No you will not fail.