No. -3 (negative three) is less than 0 (zero).
On a number graph, it would look like (going larger to smaller):
...5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4...
All negative numbers are less than zero. Always.
There seems to be a slight difference between different ethnic groups, but generally less than 10% chance of having O negative blood type.
0.2 is less than 0.8
If both parents are O negative, their child will also be O negative. This is because O negative is a recessive blood type that requires both parents to contribute an O negative allele for the child to have O negative blood type.
It is considered somewhat rare. Only 7% of the population is O Negative. Approximately 20% of the population is CMV negative. So only about 1.4% of the population is O Negative CMV negative. That is fewer than 2 our of ever 100 people. It isn't the rarest, but it is a very useful type.
YES! if you mean less than 0. dont know about o though...
That's right, negative numbers are less than zero. If you have trouble with this concept, think about money. If you have no money and you are also in debt, that is the equivalent of having a negative amount of money. Even when you get some money, if you use it to pay off your debt you could still be left with no money. So with a negative quantity, you need to add to that quantity just to get to zero.
Positive 3 is > 0 while, negative 2 is < 0. So positive 3 > negative 2.
Less than -79 means... Wait for it... LESS THAN -79 :O!
There is no whole number less than zero.
If your blood type is O negative than you could give it to any person with any blood type.
No
The second electron gain of an oxygen atom would be expected to be less negative. The reason for this outcome is that the oxygen atom gaining a second electron already has one electron and thus a negative charge. This negative charge repels the second electron to some extent, making the enthalpy of this process less negative than when the first electron was added to the neutral oxygen atom.