No, one is not a multiple of 3. A number is considered a multiple of 3 if it can be evenly divided by 3 without leaving a remainder. Since 1 divided by 3 equals 0 with a remainder of 1, it is not a multiple of 3.
No.3 is less than 5, thus cannot be a multiple of it; 3 is prime, therefore cannot be a multiple of any number besides 3 (which is one of its factors); by definition, 3 is ismply not a multiple of any number but 1 and 3.
No. However, one you you can tell is that the digits of a multiple of 3 always add up to another multiple of 3.
How about 15 as one example
One. Since 3 is a prime number.
What is a multiple of 2 and 3?A multiple of 2 and 3 is 6.
No, 3 isn't a multiple of 6 because the first multiple of 6 is 6. 3 is a factor of 6. 6 is a multiple of 3.
No, one is a factor of 3. A multiple is anything that can be divided by 3 such as 9 which is a multiple of 3 and so is 12 Think of taking the number 3 and multiplying it by 1,2,3,4,5... So the multiples of 3 are 3,6,9,12, 15,...
one
The idea is to divide one by -3 in this case.
Yes, 345 is a multiple of 3. One easy way to check whether a large number is a multiple of 3 is to add its digits, and see if they are divisible by 3. 3+4+5 = 12, which is divisible by 3.
Because any multiple cam be multiplied. A common multiple of 3 and 6 is 12. That means that every multiple of 12 also has 3 and 6 as factors.
18 is the lowest one.
1/3, 2/3, 3/3, 4/4 and so on.
No. 740 → 7 + 4 + 0 = 11 11 → 1 + 1 = 2 which is not one of 3, 6, 9 so 740 is not a multiple of 3.
No. And it is not an uncommon multiple of 3 either. In fact, it is not a multiple of 3.
Yes, it is a multiple of -1 and 3.
No - 9 is a multiple of 3.