No, rational numbers are not a subset of integers.
20137 is an integer and the integers are a subset of rational numbers!
Yes, just look at decimals. Note: integers are a subset of rational numbers.
not necessarily... An integer is a rational number, but so is any real number between consecutive integers.
No. 0.125 = 1/8 → 0.125 is a rational 0.125 is not a whole number → 0.125 is not an integer. The integers is a proper subset of the rational numbers; 0.125 does not belong to the intersection of the integers and rational numbers.
It is a non-integer. It can be a rational fraction (in decimal or rational form); it can be an irrational number (including transcendental numbers); it could be a complex number or a quaternion.
a rational number is an integer when it does not have a decimal. An integer is a whole number, no parts of a number... -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 are all integers 2.14 and 6.789 are rational numbers but not integers. see the pattern?
No. There are several real numbers that are not rational (e.g. pi). However, every rational number is also a real number. In general, whole numbers/natural numbers is a subset of the integers (i.e. every whole number is an integer), the integers is a subset of the rationals, the rationals are a subset of the real numbers. I think the real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers, but I'm not 100% positive on that.
A rational number which is an integer can be simplified to a form in which the denominator is 1. That is not possible for a rational number which is not an integer.
Every integer is a rational number.
It is a rational number, not an integer.
A rational number which is an integer can be simplified to a form in which the denominator is 1. That is not possible for a rational number which is not an integer.
It is not an integer but is a rational number.