Yes it is.
False
Yes, the collection of whole numbers is an example of a set. In mathematics, a set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects, which can be numbers, symbols, or other entities. The set of whole numbers typically includes 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, extending infinitely. This set can be denoted as {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.
Yes. It has a logical definition and no members violate that definition.
I assume you mean a set that contains a single whole number. Yes, you can have sets with zero elements, one element, two elements, etc.; so a set which contains a single number is perfectly valid.
Set is a well defined collection of objects. By the number of elements in the set, it can be classified into two as 1.Finite set 2. Infinite set. Example for finite set:{1,2,3,4,5...10}.Example for Infinite set:{1,2,3,4,.....}
There is some disagreement as to whether zero, a whole number, belongs to the set of natural numbers.
set
A number that compares part of an object or a set with the whole object or set is called a fraction. A fraction represents a division of the whole into equal parts, with the numerator indicating the number of parts taken and the denominator representing the total number of equal parts in the whole. For example, in the fraction 3/4, 3 signifies the part, while 4 signifies the whole set.
0 is the only number which is in the set of whole number but not in the natural number
There is no counterexample because the set of whole numbers is closed under addition (and subtraction).
False. The collection of natural numbers is an example of a set, not an element. An element is an individual member of a set, while the collection of natural numbers is a set itself.
No, a collection of natural numbers is not an example of an element; rather, it is a set. An element is an individual item within a set, while the collection itself, consisting of multiple natural numbers, can be referred to as a set of elements. For example, in the set {1, 2, 3}, the numbers 1, 2, and 3 are elements of that set.