No. If the horizontal axis is time, and the vertical axis is speed, and you're standing still,
Then the graph is perfectly horizontal, and it coincides with the horizontal axis.
In a speed graph, a straight vertical line represents an infinite speed, which is not physically possible. Such a line would imply that an object is covering a distance instantaneously over a finite time interval, violating the principles of physics. Therefore, a speed graph cannot have a straight vertical line.
Oh honey, let me break it down for you. In a speed-time graph, the speed line can never be perfectly vertical because that would mean the speed is changing instantaneously, which is not physically possible. Speed is the rate of change of distance with respect to time, so a vertical line would imply an infinite speed, and last time I checked, we're not living in a Fast and Furious movie.
If a graph shows distance on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis, and the speed is steadily increasing, the line representing speed will be a straight line.
infinite speed
constant speed
Because - for there to be a vertical line - time would have to stand still !
The variable plotted along the vertical axis is the distance in the first case, speed in the second. The gradient of (the tangent to) the distance-time graph is the speed while the area under the curve of the speed-time graph is the distance.
No. The vertical value of each point (the y-value) tells the speed.
Speed = distance / time A line graph with distance on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis could be used to determine speed. The speed would equal the slope of the line. Alternatively, a line graph with distance/time on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis would show speed. The acceleration would equal the slope of the line.
The given speed is constant for the given period
Constant speed ... zero acceleration.
No. The vertical coordinate tells the speed in this case. The slow is the derivate of the speed, i.e., the acceleration.