No, because is n=1, the electron is in the first energy level, therefore cannot have a l=2, because l= n-1. Or more simply put l=2 is a d-orbital, and there are no d-orbitals in the first energy level. ml=0 is correct because ml= +-l through 0.
Dividing any number by 1 equals the number you started with.
There are 5*5*5 = 125 such numbers.
There is no set of four consecutive numbers (odd or even) whose sum equals 169.
The answer depends on what the Universal set is.If the universal set is the set of all real numbers, then a' is the set of all real numbers that leave a non-zero remainder when divided by 2. Another way of defining a' is: {x | x is Real, mod(x, 2) >0}.
If the domain is the set of real numbers, so is the range.
Quantum numbers specify the orbitals in an atom. The set of numbers that cannot occur is n=3,I=3, m(sub)I=2 because there are no F-orbitals.
(2,1,-1,-1/2)
Pauli's exclusion principle
4, 2, -2
domain is set of real numbers range is set of real numbers
(3,2,-1,-1/2)
no because L cannot equal n. L = (n-1)
Dividing any number by 1 equals the number you started with.
1, 2.5 and 24 is one possible set of numbers.
If the numbers are allowed to repeat, then there are six to the fourth power possible combinations, or 1296. If they are not allowed to repeat then there are only 360 combinations.
Quantum numbers are a set of 4 imaginary numbers which explain the position and spin of electrons in an atom it can not explain an atom as a whole Iodine has 53 electrons so there are 53 sets of quantum numbers for Iodine.The above is correct. Assuming you meant to ask for the quantum numbers for the last electron added to Iodine, that would be n=5, l=1, m=0, s=1/2.
Assuming you mean the set of quantum number describing the VALENCE electrons of aluminum, they would ben = 3l = 1ml = -1s = +1/2Of course, since Al has only 1 p electron, ml could also have been 0 or +1 and s could have been -1/2