Not true.
12 + 22 = 1 + 4 = 5 which is a prime.
Or
42 + 52 = 16 + 25 = 41, also a prime.
No, there are no prime numbers that are also square numbers. Prime numbers are only divisible by 1 and themselves, while square numbers have integer square roots. Since the square root of a prime number is not an integer, a prime number cannot be a square number.
Prime numbers cannot be square numbers.
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
No, never. It would be divisible by the prime number.
The product of two prime numbers is always a composite number, and it never is a prime number.
Square numbers have too many factors to be prime.
Absolutely not. A square number has an integer square root, so by definition it has at least one factor. Prime numbers have no factors
The product of any two numbers, neither of which is 1, is never a prime number.
Prime numbers have two factors. All square numbers (other than 1) have more than that.
A [perfect] square number, by definition, has a factor which is its square root. As a result it CANNOT be a prime!
Prime factorization never includes a composite number. All numbers in prime factorization must be prime numbers.