No. They are parallel.
For the line 2x + y = 8 , the slope equals ( -2 ) so the required slope of the line which is perpendicular to it is equal to (+1/2 )
The second equation works out as y = -1/2x+6 therefore it is perpendicular
The lines are mutually perpendicular.
X equals 2 :)
If the second equation is: y minus 2x equals 3, then:y - 2x = 3 ⇒ y = 2x + 3 and it is parallel to y = 2x.Otherwise (with with missing operator as "plus", "multiply" or "divide"), the lines are neither parallel nor perpendicular.
For the line 2x + y = 8 , the slope equals ( -2 ) so the required slope of the line which is perpendicular to it is equal to (+1/2 )
No but y = -1/2x+3 is perpendicular to y = 2x+6
The second equation works out as y = -1/2x+6 therefore it is perpendicular
The lines are mutually perpendicular.
The slope of the perpendicular is -(1/2) .
X equals 2 :)
If the second equation is: y minus 2x equals 3, then:y - 2x = 3 ⇒ y = 2x + 3 and it is parallel to y = 2x.Otherwise (with with missing operator as "plus", "multiply" or "divide"), the lines are neither parallel nor perpendicular.
They are both parallel because the slope or gradient is the same but the y intercept is different.
Perpendicular to 2x - 3y = 8 through the point ( 2, 1 ) (Perpendicular means the slopes are negative inverses of each other) 3x+2y = 8
It equals to the equation of a straight line.
If: 12 = 2y+x then y = -1/2x+6 So: y = 2x+4 and y = -1/2x+6 which means that they are perpendicular lines
3