13270
6635,2
1327,5,2
Since 61 is already prime, a factor tree is not necessary. The prime factorization of 51 is 3 x 17, which wouldn't make much of a tree. More like a factor shrub.
13 is a prime number. It doesn't have a tree because its only prime factor is itself.
No you cannot. You might want to try the factor tree for 27.
63 21,3 7,3,3
by using a prime factor tree
232 116,2 58,2,2 29,2,2,2
Start with putting ur number on top then list the multiples and what the are divided by to make that number.
The purpose of a factor tree is to notate the process of finding the prime factorization. If a number is already prime, a factor tree is not necessary.
16 8,2 4,2,2 2,2,2,2
Itself because 2 is a prime number
630 315,2 105,3,2 35,3,3,2 7,5,3,3,2
32 16,2 8,2,2 4,2,2,2 2,2,2,2,2