Accuracy.
They are the objects whose measured speed as a function of time agrees well with theory.
Yes, the statement "A number of articles were interesting" is grammatically correct. The subject "number of articles" is plural, so it agrees with the plural verb "were."
Standard International unit (SI unit)
a verb that agrees with the closest subject
Accuracy is when a known value agrees with an experimental value, but is not necessarily close in range.
cell
It agrees closely with the accepted value
The correct phrase is "that was you," as the verb "was" agrees with the singular subject "you."
Something that agrees with or is in harmony with another.
He agrees with you. Or he is in agreement with you.
Inelastic brainly agrees plus me
"He is at affinity with his manager" may be technically correct, but it sounds odd to this native speaker of English. "He agrees with his manager" or "He is a relative of his manager" is more natural.
Sustained correct answer is overrules :) hunteriscool34@yahoo.com
Either phrase can be correct, as long as the rest of the sentence agrees with it; e.g. '(have/had) the pleasure of..' or 'take pleasure in..'.
carl is correct or both of them are
The correct way to write the sentence is "It was Mary and Andrew." This is because "Mary and Andrew" is a plural subject, but the verb "was" agrees with the singular subject "It."
"What is your expertise?" is correct. "Expertise" means the complete collection of a person's special skills and as such agrees with singular verbs. A sentence with the same meaning but a plural verb would be "What are your expert skills?"