5 becuse .68 is rounded up becuse it is closest to the higher number.
468,675 rounded to the nearest hundreds is 468,700
500
It is 470.
700
470 as 468 is 2 away from 470 but 8 away from 460 and 2 is smaller than 8
The whole number for 468 is simply 468 itself, as it is already a whole number. Whole numbers are non-negative integers, which include 0 and all positive integers without any decimal or fractional parts. Therefore, 468 fits this definition perfectly.
468 to the nearest 100 is 500
50000
To determine if 468 is divisible by 32, you can perform the division: 468 ÷ 32 equals approximately 14.625. Since this result is not a whole number, 468 is not divisible by 32. Therefore, 468 cannot be evenly divided by 32.
Standard rounding of 468 to the nearest thousandth: 0 (because 468 is smaller than 500. If it were bigger or equal to 500, then you'd need to round up). There are several other rounding techniques, for example in physics, it is often usual to round in a way that the relative error would be minimized (in that case, the answer would be 1000). Or stochastical rounding would non-deterministically either give 0 or 1000 (where 0 would have a chance of 46.8%, i.e. slightly smaller than the chance for 1000). But most probably the answer you're looking for is 0. All of that may be true to the nearest thousand. 468 is already rounded to the nearest thousandth, but may be written as 468.000
Oh, dude, like totally! 468 is divisible by 4 because when you divide 468 by 4, you get 117, which is a whole number without any remainders. So yeah, 468 is totally cool with being divided by 4.
500.