0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How is a division problem is like an unknown factor problem?
Because its cut
What is the meaning of dividend in division?
in the first factor of division. example:9\3=3
How do you come up with a mixed number from a division problem?
If the divisor is not a factor of the dividend, then the quotient will be either a fraction or a mixed number.
How do you determine whether a number is a factor of another number?
If N is the number, and f is the number that you want to test as a possible factor, then first of all:test N > f (this must be true, the factors are always smaller in magnitude)next perform N ÷ f (N divided by f). If the quotient (answer to a division problem) is a whole number with no remainder or fractional part, then f is a factor of N.If the quotient is not a whole number (meaning there is a remainder), then f is not a factor.
What does the unknown factor and quotient represent?
There is insufficient information to answer this question. Please edit the question to include more context or relevant information.
When is the result of division a recurring number?
When a rational fraction is expressed in its simplest form, if the denominator has any prime factor other than 2 or 5, then the quotient will be a recurring decimal.
Can the GCF of two numbers be greater that either of the numberd?
No. When finding the greatest common factor of two numbers, the factors of each number must divide that number "evenly", which means that the quotient of that division must be an integer. If a "factor" of a number were larger than that number, the quotient would be less than 1, and so the "factor" wouldn't actually be a factor because it doesn't divide the number evenly. At the same time, one can "factor" 4 out of 2 and get 4*(1/2), but that isn't considered a factor in the usual sense.
How do you find the prime factorization of 891?
You divide by one prime after another until you find a factor. Then you repeat the process with the quotient, starting with that factor.You divide by one prime after another until you find a factor. Then you repeat the process with the quotient, starting with that factor.You divide by one prime after another until you find a factor. Then you repeat the process with the quotient, starting with that factor.You divide by one prime after another until you find a factor. Then you repeat the process with the quotient, starting with that factor.
Why does 72000 divided by 9 have the same quotient as 40000 divided by 5?
72000 shares a factor with 40000. This factor is 8000. By having one factor be the same, both of these equations, when divided by the factors NOT shared, will have the same quotient.
When the quotient of two numbers is the same as the first factor what do you know about the second factor?
The 2nd factor is a square of the first one.
Can you use the word divisor in a sentence?
A sentence can say "The divisor in this division problem is 26". The word 'divisor' is a mathematics vocabulary that people get confused with 'dividend'. I hope you don't get mixed up with those similar words. By the way, 'dividend' means the number you are going to divide the divisor to get a quotient. A quotient is an answer to a division problem.That's all the vocabulary you need to know for a division problem.
What does 140 70 and 23 1 over 3 have in common?
They are all positive rational numbers.70 is a "factor" of all three, but strictly speaking, the concept of divisibility loses its meaning when considered in the context of fractions. If you allow the quotient to be fractional then any fraction can be divided, without remainder, by any non-zero fraction.231/3 = 70/3 and so division by 70 gives 1/3 - a considerable simplification, no doubt,They are all positive rational numbers.70 is a "factor" of all three, but strictly speaking, the concept of divisibility loses its meaning when considered in the context of fractions. If you allow the quotient to be fractional then any fraction can be divided, without remainder, by any non-zero fraction.231/3 = 70/3 and so division by 70 gives 1/3 - a considerable simplification, no doubt,They are all positive rational numbers.70 is a "factor" of all three, but strictly speaking, the concept of divisibility loses its meaning when considered in the context of fractions. If you allow the quotient to be fractional then any fraction can be divided, without remainder, by any non-zero fraction.231/3 = 70/3 and so division by 70 gives 1/3 - a considerable simplification, no doubt,They are all positive rational numbers.70 is a "factor" of all three, but strictly speaking, the concept of divisibility loses its meaning when considered in the context of fractions. If you allow the quotient to be fractional then any fraction can be divided, without remainder, by any non-zero fraction.231/3 = 70/3 and so division by 70 gives 1/3 - a considerable simplification, no doubt,
