Restate the question; it makes no sense.
They are both measures of probability.
Both are measures of the likelihood of events.
they are alike because they both have the last word "probability"
if u think about it not really becuause u guess in the theoretical probability by figuring out the possible outcomes and actuallty have to conduct the experiments to figure out the experimental probability the only similarity i think i know of r that they are both probability's and you get an outcome in both of the =] sorry if I'm not much help XOXO, Nia
They are both measures of the probability of an event occurring.
The difference between experimental probability and theoretical probability is that experimental probability is the probability determined in practice. Theoretical probability is the probability that should happen. For example, the theoretical probability of getting any single number on a number cube is one sixth. But maybe you roll it twice and get a four both times. That would be an example of experimental probability.
Both are measures of the likelihood of events whose outcome is uncertain.
They are both estimates of the probability of outcomes that are of interest. Experimental probabilities are derived by repeating the experiment a large number of times to arrive at these estimates whereas theoretical probabilities are estimates based on a mathematical model based on some assumptions.
They are both measures of how likely it is that a particular event will occur.They are both measures of how likely it is that a particular event will occur.They are both measures of how likely it is that a particular event will occur.They are both measures of how likely it is that a particular event will occur.
That probability is the product of the probabilities of the two individual events; for example, if event A has a probability of 50% and event B has a probability of 10%, the probability that both events will happen is 50% x 10% = 5%.
The probability that he will not win both games is 0.58