I guess the formula is 3x² MOD 11 where x is the last pseudo-random number. Just plug in the values:
x = 5 → next_val = 3 × 5² MOD 11 = 9
x = 9 → next_val = 3 × 9² MOD 11 = 1
x = 1 → next_val = 3 ×1² MOD 11 = 3
So the next three values would be 9, 1, 3.
There are many methods of generating pseudorandom numbers. Some of them are middle square (not very good), Mersenne twister, linear congruential generator (one the oldest used in math libraries, but subject to sequential corellation artifacts), and cryptographically secure generators.
Is a set of numbers that look random and will pass most tests of randomness.
No because natural numbers are whole numbers starting from 1
The median of the set of all the whole numbers starting from 1 and ending with 9 is 5. The numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and the median (middle number) is the number 5.
It is a definitional thing. Counting numbers are whole numbers (integers) starting with 1.
There are many methods of generating pseudorandom numbers. Some of them are middle square (not very good), Mersenne twister, linear congruential generator (one the oldest used in math libraries, but subject to sequential corellation artifacts), and cryptographically secure generators.
In computing, a hardware random number generator is an apparatus that generates random numbers from a physical process.
The Luhn algorithm is used.
81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.
No because natural numbers are whole numbers starting from 1
Is a set of numbers that look random and will pass most tests of randomness.
factors are numbers that are divisible by your starting number (will divide into your starting number). For example the factors of 12 are 2,3,4,6&12
The median of the set of all the whole numbers starting from 1 and ending with 9 is 5. The numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and the median (middle number) is the number 5.
If you generated this number using a random numers list or random numbers generator, then the best guess would be that your use of it is the first.
No. The natural numbers are the counting numbers {1, 2, 3, ...}.
It is a definitional thing. Counting numbers are whole numbers (integers) starting with 1.
If the population is of size N, then you allocate the numbers 1 to N to them: one per element of the population. Then generate random numbers in the range 1 - N. The element whose number is thrown up by the generator is in the sample. In the unlikely event that a number is repeated, you ignore the repeat and continue drawing the sample until you have the required correct number in the sample.