Friction
Heat generated
Energy lost in loose links and gears etc.
Losses of energy within the machine- some of the energy is used up by friction, and converted to heat. There is also the matter of efficency of a machine. The less efficent, the more power you must put in to get the same output.
No, it's actually less efficent.
I would say that the output would be less. What would you think? Actually it matters what machine your talking about but hopefully ur output work would be more then your input work because that would mean the machine is doing more. This would mean its more efficent
the benefitd of the kinetoscope are less power to run it (more efficent) and does not cost much at all.
In Canada, sprawling wheat fields and agricultural farming used with large machinery is the better way to more efficent, make larger land, less time and less labour intensive.
no machine has one
They use less power for an equivalent amount of illumination compared to incandescent lights which waste a lot of energy in heat.
Friction between moving parts can cause energy loss in a simple machine, reducing its efficiency below 100 percent. Additionally, external factors such as air resistance or other forms of resistance can also contribute to energy losses in a simple machine.
In such a machine, the remaining energy is wasted to friction
Yes. Since more work goes to counter the friction force, less work goes to do the actual function of the machine.
ride a bike or walk to places more. also watch less t.v and use more energy efficent lightbulbs
Every real machine is subject to forces that reduce output. These include actual forces such as friction, or human controlled forces such as imperfect machining. This reduces the output to less than the ideal.