redo tour experiment over and over again
There is no more accurate descriptions of matter than measurements. To get the description right make your measurements precise.
Either can be accurate. Depends on how accurate your measurements or equipment is. The shape of the objects could be a major factor, too.
Take the actually measurements in kilometers (km) and convert them to centimeters (cm) and record them so that the measurements will be more accurate.
Very, the more accurate the the measurements the more accurate the results, thus furthering more accurate tests down the road based on said results. The more tests you do on bad results the further off the results get with every test you do. Changing the independent of the test with bad measurements would void a result.
by using a more accurate thermometer by repeating the measurements between 30% and 50% tin by increasing the number of measurements between 40% and 60% tin by increasing the number of measurements between 50% and 70% tin
It depends on what flask and what the quality of it is. If there is a hole in the flask, then obviously, no measurements. Most of the time, flasks do NOT give the most accurate measurements. Although, they do give more accurate measurements than a human eyeball and flasks do have their strengths compared to other tools as well.
You could do it by saying that all your measurements were 10 centimetres - irrespective of what they actually were. That would be neither precise nor accurate but it sure would be consistent!
Bmi
A vernier caliper.
The measurements are inaccuarate.
Neither measurement is more "accurate" than the other--they simply denote different things. Length is a measurement of the distance between two points in space. Area is a measurement of the surface covered by a given shape.
the equipment used to make accurate measurements of is a watch