probability
Whenever Mendel performed a cross with pea plants, he carefully categorized and counted the many offspring. Every time Mendel repeated a particular cross, obtained similar results. For example, whenever Mendel crossed two plants that were hybrid for stem height (Tt), about three fourths of the resulting plants were tall and about one fourth were short. Mendel realized that the principles of probability could be used to explain the results of genetic crosses.
Probability is related to inheritance because in Mendel's experiments, the probabilities were important. Each time Mendel repeated the cross, he observed that the principles of probability applied to his experiment.
Probability and genetics go hand in hand. Mendel in his charts showed the probability of dominant and recessive genes being passed on to offspring. The desired trait could be cultivated knowing the probability of inheritance.
Mendel studied a large sample of pea plants to ensure the reliability and statistical significance of his results. By observing numerous plants, he could identify consistent patterns of inheritance and reduce the impact of random variations. This large sample size allowed him to formulate his laws of inheritance, such as the Law of Segregation and the Law of Independent Assortment, with greater confidence in their applicability to future generations. Ultimately, it helped establish the foundational principles of genetics.
Gregor Mendel proposed the principles of heredity by studying the inheritance of traits in pea plants. He discovered that traits are passed down from parents to offspring in a predictable manner and that certain traits can be dominant or recessive. Mendel's work laid the foundation for the field of genetics.
Mendel wondered why traits in pea plants were passed down in certain patterns from generation to generation. He sought to understand how characteristics like flower color and seed shape were inherited and how they could be predicted in offspring. This led him to discover the basic principles of genetics.
IMHO, the value of a set of data is based on the economic value that can be realized using that data, and the probability that someone will apply the data to realize that value. Is this the kind of answer you are looking for? If so, we could develop an example case.
Mendel used thousands of pea plants in his experiments to ensure the reliability and accuracy of his results. By studying a large number of plants, he was able to observe consistent patterns of inheritance and eliminate the influence of random variations that could skew the data. This allowed him to establish the principles of inheritance that form the basis of modern genetics.
it would not fertilize
Yes it could be.
Let's step through the verb realize from future to present to past to past participle. Ready? Let's jump. I will realize. I could realize. I should realize. I realize. I realized. I have realized. I could have realized. I should have realized. The word realized is past tense. You can't "should realized" in this light. You should realize that.
There could be many questions: What is the probability of rolling an even number. What is the probability of rolling an odd number. What is the probability of rolling a number less than 4. What is the probability of rolling a number more than 3. What is the probability of rolling 1,4, or 6. Basically it could be any question about the probability of rolling half of the faces.