In Schultz v. Wheaton, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals determined that jobs do not need to be identical but rather "substantially equal" in order to be protected under the Equal Pay Act.
Werner Schultz has written: 'Die Religion Wilhelm v. Humboldts' 'Schleiermacher und der Protestantismus' -- subject(s): Protestantism
The Lau v. Nichols case is an example of the courts interpreting the meaning of federal laws.
J. V. Hewes has written: 'The high courts of heaven'
Marbury v. Madison
Donald V. Schultz has written: 'Measuring physician integration in health care systems' -- subject(s): Attitudes, Continuity of Patient Care, Group medical practice, Health care teams, Health services administration, Medical cooperation, Organizational Affiliation, Physicians, Social integration
Nothing surprises me.
Judicial Review
no one knows
Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in 1803's Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review - the ability of federal courts to find a federal or state law inconsistent with the US Constitution.
Marbury v. Madison produced the idea of judicial review, which means the courts can interpret how the laws are used in court.
Significance: state sovereignty
no one knows