Want this question answered?
256 works, if each term is the square of the one before it
It could be 68.191, if the rule is to divide each term by 1.0999 to get the next one.It could be 68.5, if the rule is to subtract 6.5 from each term to get the next one.If you gave us one more number in the sequence, we could tell.
It is not possible to identify a sequence when given only one number, as in this questions.
The next term is 939.Each term is one less than (4 times the previous term).
A sequence never ends. The next number in this one is 7 .
This is a geometric sequence. Each number is multiplied by the same constant, to get the next number. If you divide any number by the previous one, you can find out what this constant is.
There is only one number in the question and one number does not make a sequence.
381838 is one number: it does not describe a sequence.
One number is not sufficient to identify a sequence.
256 works, if each term is the square of the one before it
Each number is being added to the one before it. So, 5+3=8. 8 is the next number.
It could be 68.191, if the rule is to divide each term by 1.0999 to get the next one.It could be 68.5, if the rule is to subtract 6.5 from each term to get the next one.If you gave us one more number in the sequence, we could tell.
One numbers, such as 9162433, cannot comprise a sequence.
There is no sequence, please add one and I'll help.
notice that the difference between each consecutive number are 3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144 also notice that if you add each pair you get the next one so the next in this sub sequence is 233 and when you add that to 376 in the main sequence you get the answer 609
It is not possible to identify a sequence when given only one number, as in this questions.
There are infinitely many different polynomials of degree 8 that will fit all the numbers of the above sequence. Each will generate a different number as the next one in the sequence.