Nowadays we would consider that the correct conversion of 1499 into Roman numerals to be MCDXCIX but then there is historical evidence to show that the ancient Romans would have worked out the equivalent of 1499 on an abacus calculating device as MCCCCLXXXXVIIII and then logically abridged it to IMD in written format thus facilitating the speed and ease of the required calculations as follows:-
MDCCLXXVI+IMD = MMMCCLXXV => 1776+(1500-1) = 3275
MDCCLXXVI-IMD = CCLXXVII => 1776-(1500-1) = 277
Note that in arithmetic -(1500-1) becomes 1-1500
QED
There are no negative numbers in the Roman numeric system.
The answer is 185.....but in Roman Numerals it is.....CLXXXV
Expressed in Roman numerals, 1999 - 1910 is equal to LXXXIX.
They are worked out as in the following formats:- MDCCS:. + LXXV:. = MDCCLXXVI => 1700.75 + 75.25 = 1776 MDCCS:. - LXXV:. = MDCXXVS => 1700.75 - 75.25 = 1625.5
94 in roman numerals is XCIVNinety is represented by 100 minus 10. This would be written as XCIV.
XCIX - XIX = LXXX
This is tricky because 400 is shown as 500 minus 100. And 50 is going to be L. CDLIV is the way to write it in Roman Numerals.
The Roman numeral XCIV represents the number 94. In Roman numerals, "XC" stands for 90 (100 minus 10), and "IV" represents 4 (5 minus 1). Therefore, when combined, they total 94.
In Roman numerals: CVII minus X = XCVII meaning 107 minus 10 = 97
1900 is shown by a thousand plus a thousand minus 100. The depiction would be MCMXV.
If you mean 217 minus 184 then as a Roman numeral the difference is XXXIII
Save yourself the trouble and convert the numbers to arabic numbers (the numbers we usually use).